To a relativistic universe
Gert-Henrik Bergqvist
Preface
The Bible Begin with the story of creation. After the story of creation there is maintained something which became to get such a great signification for the humanity that will say the fall of man. The first human beings broke against the will of God and became banished from the paradise. We now see the consequenses and have seen during the history. War and suffering and now pollution. The examples for that a fall of man has happen are many.
Nietsches die Geburt der Tragedi and Steinbecks the Grapes of Wrath and East of Eden. And how was knowledge under these circumstances possible? We have then the ancient Greece. How rich was not the sience in the ancient Greece. Philosophy, geometry and matematics. Thales everything is sets. Names like Aximenes Aximandros. Everything is fire, everything is water. Zeno contemporary with Jeremia.
Pythagoras theorem . The square of the hypotenuse is the sum of the squares of the katetes.
We return to the Bible. Jesaja thousand years before Christ King David
Back to Greece. Platon and Socrates. Platons dialogues
Parmenides and the meaning of words. The miracles of Jesus and the strength of words. The physical force is so strong that it can penetrate everything. Euclides geometry that become to get such a great significance. From the ancient time we take the step to the modern time. We have Newton and Leibniz and their discover of the infinitesimal calculus. Newton writes his Matematica We have matematicians as Gauss Riemann and Lobatjevskij. Non-Euclidian geometry and matematics of tensors that become such a great significance to Einsteins theory of relativity.
A thanks to phil. lis Mika Burstein and docent Patrik Sibelius.
This work I dedicate to med.lis Riitta Santamala.
To a relativistic universe
Do you have a world empire won enjoy there over not. Do you have a world empire lost not mourn. Soon the whole world dimish. Nothing is in my youth, the origin of the universe were lively discussed. It was first Fred Hoyles theory about stationary universe with created mass and the Big Bang the theory of explosion. I remember that I preferred Hoyles theory in the discussions. It seemed to me that the mass must come from somewhere while the theory of explosion leave the question as such. From where come the origin egg in the theory of explosion then? It was first some years later I come in the occasion to nearer aware of problems concerning time and space I had studied philosophy some years when I returned to the farm in Nagu for the first case for my health. I had problem with the back and needed motion. In the attic I made deeper my knowledges in philosophy.
Soon my thoughts begun to go over to the aria of space and time. One of the first was that I understood the connection between existence and expansion. The redshift of the light is a fact. The universe expands The theories about the universe did not seem satisfactional.
Without doubt it was pretty easy to understand that the expansion depends of growth. I stroke the hand at the table and thought: it is growth. This table must come from somewhere.
It is growth of mass. It was natural to imagine a geometrical series.. The universe growths like a tree. One atom gives arise to two atoms. It is the structure of the universe. Which consequences have the tesis concerning growth for space and time. When I move in the room I move four-dimensiocally. Three dimensiocally within the walls of the room and one-dimensically in time. When I am sitting at the table I move one dimensiocally in time in relation to the room. Now I ask: which velocity do I have in the flow of time. Which is our velocity in time and space?
Einstein put at one occasion the time within guolotions marks. These I consider not as satisfactionally. The time must have a defined velocity a defined value. I maintained earlier the universe like a tree Where do we take place in the tree? Which is our place time and space? In a thought beginning the time is running fast, the distances are long with increasing velocity through growth of mass, the time will go slower and the distance is shorter. Our galax the milky way is situated in a place there between in the growing tree. I bellieve that the Golden Section should be a gold value for out place in space and time. Ever sinne a thought beginning to the end of the growing tree.
The universe is Non-uniform till space and time. This has consequences for the measure of light. Here in out reference the Speed of light is 300,000 km/sec. According to Einstein the velocity of light is constant. It is true in uniformtime and space. But as I have tried to show is the universe not uniform. It is relative to space and time. This fact reminds about that that in Einsteins theory of gravitaation where the field is Non-uniform and the Speed of light is not constant. Checkers in very long distances from each other should come to different results About the speeed of light. Not so that light should have different velocity at different places, but so that the checkers are stationed in different situations: fast room and show room. It has widely been discussed in which case there is an objectiv e given velocity of light. We have here one and two ways problem in that case that light is the fasted signal Arisi a difficulty to check this oneway i. e. from one point to another, that will say you must perform it forth and back from one point to another.
It has been Tried to check the light one way for at this case measure an objective given velocity of light but have not succeded. I do not believe that it is possible to check the light one way and in this case measure an objective given velocity of light. The light is measurement to the mass. Then we have a quantity given by Einstein.
An assumption
An assumption that the Speed of light is the same back and forth. Wesley Salmon handles the problem Abut the Speed of light in his book Space time and motion. Pretty soon I understood that to talk Abut the Speed of light is a pietty diffcult question. A law of nat an assumption.Can it be correct?As I earlier maintained holds the velocity of light only in out referece. In the equation E=MC2 for example is C only a root not a velocity.Our reference, out galax theMilky way measures the Speed of light to us. Einstein showed that thes Speed of light in gravitationalfield is not constant As I already have maintainedI I consider that the Golden Section is out reference out Palace in space and time.From a thought beginning until the end of the growing tree. It is perhaps on its Palace to claryfy the Golden Sektion a little nearer.
I consider that the Golden Section determines the Spede of light in out reference. As I maintained above is the universe Non- uniform precisely as the field of the gravitaation is it In a thought beginning the time runs fast the distances are long. With growing velocity through growth of mass the time will g slower an d the distances shorter.I believe that one can explain quasares and cosmical ray on the basis of this assumtions I believe that quasares are old universe with fast time.The processes run faster there. It should explain the energy emission. Cosmical ray on the other hand is Young universe with great veocity.It should explain the high Moring energy of the cosmical ray. I have spoken about the universe like a tree. The universe growths like a geometrical serie. I discovered that I had found a new geometrical conception. It will say tree geometry that ramifies in this way:
The treegeometry is the massgeometry of the universe. In the beginning was a divisible distance. God divides. One atom gives Arise to two atomi It is the structure olf the unniverse.How the atomi are constructed is a task for experimentalists, but something can be noticed in this question. The nuclear Building stones,the quarks are already recognized. I believe that there exists a particle dialectic. God says that we have something, a particle, then we have immediately an oppiosite particle. These establish a synthes until the nucleon is constructed. But as I said: this is laboratorium work.Can the universe be described mathematically in a single formula? I believe that it is possible. We have framely Einsteins field equation.
The formula remains incomprehensible for the reader without explanations. I wrote the formula 1981. I had been ill for some years, depending on phsychofarmaca that was given to me during my reside at Ekåsen hospital.It was to the pesher-81 saturday before palmsunday my thoughts were concentrated on the problems of geometries.It was then I understood that the treegeometry must be squared.But how can½ be squared symboli ½ will be a mathematical necessity.It became summer -81.I were in a very exalted condition. But healthy.It was then I saw the formula in a vision.I did not see it so clearly that I could white it d,own but later I wrote it. In Hans Reichenbachs book The philosophy of space and timLearit About tensormathematics. The capitle the analytic treatment of Riemannian spaces became instructive to me Knowledges in tensormathematics are necessary both forEinsteins general theory of relativity and my theory .Then to the formula The symboli Ruv describes the curvature of the universe. ZYV again the threedimensional coordinat system.Treegeometry do not recognize surfaces.The forks in the growing tree can turn out how whatever direction Therefore we need a threedimensioinal coordinatsystem.
We have here a threedimensional coordinat system which is necessary to describe a space with treegeometrical qualitiesAs I have above maintained I assert that the mass universe is tree geometry.In the beginning was a divisible distance. God divides in this way.The universe is tree.A fine-meshed tree but still a tree. When we see a tree in nature, we see it in threedimensional environment.There in universe it is a different manner. There is the tree itself the geometry. Which characteristic does the treegeometyry have? I believe that we do not n eeg Togo describe it axiomatically. the treegeometry ramifies in this way:
It Arisi a kind of paralells.As a family tree parents children,cousins etc.Atree which grows has branches.they are so to speak of the same age, the same generation.As I see it the treegeometry does not Konow surfaces. A fork can turn over in whatever manner in the growing tree Therefore we need a threedimensional coordinat system. How the light pass in a treegeometrical space should I with pleasure want to Know. In the beginning the velocity is z-ero, the time runs infinitely fast. God divides
Then become time and space into the picture.One atom causes two atomi.Gradually we have a space-time system,where we can useclocks and rods to measure space-time relations.I believe that quasares are old universe with fast time.The quasares energy emission depend presumabily on the fact that the processes run faster there. If we now Apply Einsteins field equations on these early objects we have a mathematical explanation to them. The gravitaation has taken over and has established bodies
We have Einsteins field equation:
Further we have my treegeometrical space where C is a definition not a velocity. with aid of these assumptions we can give an explanation of he quasares. As I have argued the Golden Section determines the Spede of light as we see it in out reference.
In the equation E=mc2 is C a root, not a velocity.How can we mathematically show that in the beginning the time runs fast, the distaces are long, further with growing velocity by groth of mass the time will g slower an the distances shorter.
Can we Apple the same formulas as in gravitational field When we handle treegeometrical space.i believe that we can do it.
In the beginning the velocity is z-ero, the time runs infinytely fast. God divides: Then become time and space into the picture. One atom causes two Atomi. Then we have a space-time system, where we can use Clocks and rods to explain space time relations.
I believe that quasares is old universe with fast time. The energy emission of the quasares depend probabillity on the fact that processes run fast.
Furthermore we have my treegeometrical space where C is a definition not a velocity. With aid of these assumptions we can explain quasares. As I have argued the Golden Section determines the Spede of light as we see it in out reference. There are a lot of equations that suggest that the velocity of light is such as we see it. This formulas can then only take Palace in out reference and not in the universe as whole As I have said I understand the universe like a tree. Certainly a fine-meshed tree in infinitesimal leve l but still a tree The galaxies will hang like fruits in a tree. In the beginning of the beginning of the universe we have quasares then galaxies and at last cosmical ray with great velocity.
Then we have the conception of simultaneity. Einstein speak About the relativity of simultaneity.Two events that are simultaneous in out reference are it not in another reference that is Moring in respect to the first. The word simultaneity seems to be a construction. I should want to replace it with a ”now” nowfloth .The worldline is a serie of unique moments.We are always in Every moment in a new situation. These depend on the thesis of growth. It becomes time and mass This fact show for us in out daily life: the litterbagbecomes full,the newspaperstack grows. Everything show for us that it is growth.
The thesis of growth of mass has conseqwenses for the conception of cause and effect. In the Seventeet I kept a lecture at the instituution of philosophy at Åbo Akademy where I set out my thesis Abut that one can not accept an objective given room, only a being of something. This being is growth of mass. God handles before us. God is the case. God divides. One atom give raise to two atomi. Sören Kierkegaard says: the truth is the subjective, right so.
We have then a subjective principle where God is the subject.When the growth happens in the border of the universe. God handles. How fast reach us the effect of the handlng of God? The answer must be: immediately or almost immediately. How can an effect reach us immediately on so long distances? I do not Konow if I have an answer to give on this question. It only is so. God is everywhere present, but Sampo grinds inexorably to the end of the time. We live on mass rate.I understand it natural l that is so For Evert instant there must Arisi mass that the universe shall remain. I think myself that it is a logical thought. Time and mass.
We are not alone in the universe. I Know it because I have spoke with the nabours in the Milky way. with aid of telepathy, word, logos I have done a several times, but it was in the phsyciatrical clinic of Kupittaa it happened at the first time. Riitta Santamala was my doctor Who I lied very much It was among the spruces at the division 73 The man WHO I spoke with in the space, spoke English. He was very polit and he spoke with a cultivated voice. I heard the cosmical surge. He called me Sir. He said also: look at your chief
Sir. He meant Jesus.
Further we spoke About a task which had occupied my thoughts ikt will say a kind of uncertain principle. There is a danger that one so to speak falls down in the deep if one has committed sin. Jesus went up to the heaven , but there is also an opposite thing, a danger that one falls down in the deep in a Helvetia condition This I have called a kind of uncertain principle. About this I spoke with the man in the space .He said: we have a man. I understood that he knew About someone WHO had felt down in the deep. It is almost all I remember of the discussion, but it was a pleasant experience.
The Milky Way is full of life. People like we. I imagine apple baskets. The apples are then planets with life. b ut it is so that in the apple baskets are apples which are rottien or half rottien. There is a probability that this is the case. Now it is so that we arte living on a rotten or half rottien apple. The Fall of man is a realitu. I believe in the evoluution but Adam and Eve were the first real people. I do not Konow how it was with the tree of knowledge, but the fact was that they Broko against the Will of God and become banished out of the Paradise. There was probability for the Fall of man WHO God created. God calculated with this When he Gave Man freedom.Jeremias says : the misfortune is a reality. So it is. The consequences of the Fall of Man we have seen and are still seeing through the history. Warp ,suffering, crucifixion of Jesus etc. And now damaged agriculture and polluution.
Let the Earth be cursed for your sake says God to Adam. I spoke About apple baskets. Suns and planets with life can be seeked at the same distances from the center of the Milky Way as we are.It will say at the middle of the Milky Way from the border to the center. Spiral arms. Middle-sized Star which rotat slowly can contain life. On which distance are the nabours? I do not Konow,but perhaps already at ten light-years away. It ought to be Quito possible to get contact with them at radio and TV.I have also thought Abut another problem i.es. starmap.How can it be possible to get order on the many planets with life. Apple-baskets.I had an idea Abut primo number.
Prime number is:1.3.5.7.11.13.17.19.23.etc.In a vision I saw the primo number for out planet.It was number 23.But I do not Know if it is correct.But it is not only here in the Milky Way there is life.There are many galaxies on the right distance from a thought beginning until the end of the growing tree that have life. I think About the Golden Section.
When I look on the Milky Way I can hear the voice of God. He says: I am the Lord. How great is not the Lord Sebaot. Perhaps does he love us still more through the Fall of Man
I have put out the tepsis About that one can not assume an objective given room. However there are room that can be defined i.e. the Platonian bodies or the five regular polyeders . The regular tetraeder which is enclosed by for eqiulateral triangles. The regular octaeder which is enclosed by eigh equilateral triangles. The regular icosaeder which is enclosed by twenty equilated triangles. The regular hexaeder which by six quadrates.The regular dodekaeder which is enclosed by twelv regular pent.corners.
A fork Y will be a symboli for the world . The star of David Will be the symbolic for the heaven.
The new Jerusalem
Then I saw a new heaven and a new Earth for the first heaven and the first Earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem ,coming down out of heaven from God prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying: now the dwelling of God is with men,and he will live them.They will be his people,and God himself will be with them and be Their God. He will Wide Evert tear from Teir edes. There Will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.
Immediately after the distress of those days.The sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light,the Star will Falk from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.
When now the Worlds are opening ,Wien the Milky Ways are opening and all people of the universe are gathering to Teir respective New Jerusalem. When all Worlds of the universe are meeting in a enormous radiance, enormous Crystal breightness the eternal life, we will understand which a delight it was to be there.
Jesus Christ will b e with you.
Wrote Gert-Henrik Bergqvist.
